In Response to Tom “Donald Davidson's ‘What Metaphors Mean’”
After reading Tom’s blogpost that concerned his thoughts about David Davidson’s argument regarding metaphors, I began to question a few ideas that Tom raised. Before I proceed, I should point out that Tom’s post was certainly beneficial in providing some sort of introduction to Davidson’s argument. In addition, I agree with most of the point raised in the post. However, there were certain ideas brought up that I now wish to consider further.
“The literal meaning of a metaphor is the correct interpretation of what the words say. That is not to say that the metaphor should be taken literally.”
This statement caused me a lot of confusion. In essence, it seems that the first sentence is stating that, a metaphor is correctly interpreted through its literal meaning; thus, this is the way in which the reader should interpret it. However, the next sentence states that a metaphor should not be interpreted in its literal sense. At this point, I cannot help but interpret this passage as being anything else but inherently contradictory. With that being said, I think that I do understand the point that is being made. Davidson does concede that a metaphor clearly does have an effect on the reader which goes beyond the words literal meanings. However, this is not to say that metaphors are interpreted as having some metaphorical, hidden meaning. They are interpreted literally, but this process ultimately causes the reader to make connections between ideas. Davidson says, “I have no quarrel with these descriptions of the effects of metaphor, only with the associated views as to how metaphor is supposed to produce them. (228)”. Davidson is not denying that metaphors cause the reader to make connections that run deeper than the words literal meanings, however, he maintains that there is no other way in which to interpret a metaphor than by its literal meaning. Accordingly, under Davidson’s view, it seems that it may be misguided to state that a metaphor should not be taken literally. I understand that metaphors work in a way in which the reader ends up accepting a statement in its literal sense. However, the only way in which the reader can interpret the metaphor is through using the words literal meanings because of the fact that there is no hidden meaning.
